Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3940/2025 of M/s Sagittal Infra Projects Vs SRI G SAI PRASAD on 27 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3940/2025 Between: 1. M/S SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/ A ,

APHC010674962025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3940/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/A, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI K. KRISHNA KISHORE

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES (CAD) DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.

2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE PRI SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.

3. R MOHANA RAO, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

4. B ANJANEYA PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

5. KATTA SOMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOLLAPUDI VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for violating the Orders of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No 9318 of 2024 dated 06- 05-2025 in the interest of Justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. T S RAYALU

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.9318 of 2024 has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in this contempt case.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case stands closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3940/2025

Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead