WP/9923/2018 of D. Dandachary, Vs The State Andhra Pradesh, on 27 January 2026

1. D. DANDACHARY,, S/O. MUNIRATNAMCHARY AGED 60 YEARS, D.NO.4-11, KODANDARAMAPURAM, MUNGILIPATTU KOTHAPALLE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. B. JYOTHI,, W/O. LATE B. MOHAN, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 0-1, DASARIRATHNAM, MUKHARAVARIPALLE, KOTHAPALLE,

3. B. RAMA KRISHNA,, S/O. B.VENKATESH, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. 1- 18, M. KOTHAPALLI, MUNGILIPATTU KOTHAPALLE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. M. JAYASANKAR,, S/O. M. DORASWAMY NAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, MUNGILIPATTU KOTHAPALLE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. K. SOMA SEKHAR NAIDU,, S/O. KONDAIAH NAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. MUNGILIPATTU KOTHAPALLE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, A.P. MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT.

5. THE ASST DIRECTOR, A.P. MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MUGALAPATTI KOTHAPALLI, M.D.O OFFICE, CHANDRAGIR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their agricultural lands in S.No. 59-B-12 of an extent of Ac. 1.96, 2nd petitioner S.No. 59-B-11 of an extent of Ac. 4.00, 3rd petitioner S.No.59-B-3 of an extent of Ac. 4.63 cents, 4th petitioner in S.NO. 59-B-14 and 59-B-10 in total extent of Ac.2.81 cents Act. 1.06 cents and Ac. 1.01 cents and 5th petitioner got property in S.No. 59- B-9 of an extent of Ac. 2.55 cents situated in Mungilipattu-Kothapalle Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their agricultural lands in S.No. 59-B-12 of an extent of Ac. 1.96, 2nd petitioner S.No. 59-B-11 of an extent of Ac. 4.00, 3rd petitioner S.No.59-B-3 of an extent of Ac. 4.63 cents, 4th petitioner in S.NO. 59-B-14 and 59-8-10 in total extent of Ac.2.81 cents Act. 1.06 cents and Ac. 1.01 cents and 5th petitioner got property in S.No. 59-B-9 of an extent of Ac. 2.55 cents situated in Mungilipattu-Kothapalle Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri K. Sagar, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Jagadish Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9923/2018

Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS