Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/3129/2018 of Narem Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 27 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3129/2018 Between: 1. NAREM CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATADRI REDDY,

APHC010070572018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 3129/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. NAREM CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATADRI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF KOTAPAILI ROAD, PILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR

3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, PILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PILER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. SMT NAREM SURYA KUMARI, W/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF KOTAPALLE ROAD, PILER TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

7. SRI NAREM VENKATRAMANA REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATADRI REDDY, AGED ABOUT. 60 YEARS, OCC. PROFESSOR, DEAN OF CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY, 0/O PROVOST, 2000, CLAYTON STATE BUILDINGS, MORROW, GA, 302600285, PH. 6784664165.

JS,J W.P.No.3129/2018

FAX. 6784664119, E-MAIL.NAREMREDDY@LAYTON.EDU

8. SRI NAREM MADHUSUDHANA REDDY, S/O VENKATADRI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC. TEACHER, RESIDENT OF KOTAPALLE VILLAGE, PILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not passing any order in an Appeal ROC/B4 /2795/2017 which was filed for cancellation of Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds in respect of the properties admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.37/1, Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.37/2, Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.38, Ac.0.25 cents in Sy.No.560/1, Ac.0.16 cents in Sy.No.560/2, Ac.0.16 cents in Sy.No.560/3, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.560/5, Ac.2.40 cents in Sy.No.560/6, Ac.0.24 cents in Sy No.525, Ac.0.37 1/2 cents in Sy.No.439/6 and Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.440 and part of the properties in Sy.Nos.561/2, 527/186 and 527/2, situated in Piler village and Mandal, Chittoor District issued in favour of respondents 6 to 8 as illegal and arbitrary and pass such pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent not to entertain any document submitted for registration by the third parties with regard to the properties admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.37/1, Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.37/2, Ac.0.20 cents in $y.No.38, Ac.0.25 cents in Sy.No.560/1, Ac.0.16 cents in Sy.Na.560/2, Ac.0.16 cents in Sy.No.560/3, Ac.0.06 cents in Sy.No.560/5, Ac.2.40 cents in Sy.No.560/6, Ac.0.24 cents in Sy.No.525, Ac.0.37 1/2 cents in Sy.No.439/6 and Ac.0.20 cents in Sy.No.440 and part of the properties in Sy.Nos.561/2, 527/1& 527/2 situated in Piler village and Mandal, Chittoor District pending finalization of appeal No.ROC/B4/2795/2017 before the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KUMARA RATNAM TENNETI

JS,J W.P.No.3129/2018

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

3. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

JS,J W.P.No.3129/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri.V.Rajanna, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 3129/2018

Dated: 28.01.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead