Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1222/2018 of R.V. Srinivasa Rao, Vs Sri. R. Karikal Valaven, IAS, on 26 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3568] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1222/2018

APHC010345362018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1222/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. R.V. SRINIVASA RAO,, OCC MUNICIPAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUNTUR,

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI R KARIKAL VALAVEN IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MA 86 UD DEPARTMENT, STATE OF A.P., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI V CHANDRAIAH, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF PUBLIC HEALTH, STATE OF A.P., TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to summon and punish the respondents under section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully disobeying to implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.16212 of 2017 dated 28.4.2017 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)

2. The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1222 of 2018 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Contempt Case, nothing survives in this Contempt Case for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Contempt Case as infructuous.

2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous.

3. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Dated: 27.01.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1222 of 2018

Dated: 27.01.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead