Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11581/2025 of MUVVALA ADI LAKSHMI Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 26 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 11581/2025 Between:
APHC010231182025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11581/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MUVVALA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O RAMBABU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-107, AMBEDKAR COLONY, 10TH LANE, RAMNAGAR, BESIDE ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P.-523001.
2. SRI MUVVALA RAMBABU, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, AGED 43 YEARS, UNEMPLOYEE, D.NO.6-107, AMBEDKAR COLONY, 10TH LANE, RAMNAGAR, BESIDE ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. - 523001.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, Rep.by its Authorized Officer cum Chief Manager, Aluru Mark, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, Branch Code 64267, Vijayawada, NTR District. A.P.
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be kindly be pleased to issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondent in attempting to take possession of petitioners house i.e., in D. No. 300/ C2 A1, in an extent of 90.87 Sq. yards/ 750 Sq. feet Narasaraopet village AND Mandal, Guntur District and handover the possession to the authorized person of respondent, in pursuance of the order dated 04-04-2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 219 of 2025 by the Court of Principal Assistant Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Guntur in appointing an Advocate Commissioner, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, violative of Rule 3(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 and consequently set aside the order dated 04-04- 2025, directing the respondent not to take any coercive steps and not to evict the petitioners from the subject house. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CH NAGENDRAMU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and that no further orders are required to be passed.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 27.01.2026 ARB
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11581/2025
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
27.01.2026 ARB