Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2573/2025 of SYAM SUNDAR MAHESWARI @ SHYAM SUNDER MAHESWARI Vs VARSHIT AQUA WET on 22 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2573/2025 Between: 1. SYAM SUNDAR MAHESWARI @ SHYAM SUNDER MAHESWARI, S/O. LATE RATANALAL MAHESWARI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, DIRECTOR,
APHC010518152025
IN TH
FRIDAY, TH
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
CIVIL REVIS
CIVIL REVISION PETITI
Between:
1. SYAM SUNDAR M
S/O. LATE RATAN
DIRECTOR, SUBH
LIMITED, PENUMU
MANDAL, GUNTUR
1. VARSHIT AQUA
Basavaiah aged 5
District
Petition under Articl
circumstances stated in
pleased to
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Secti
in the affidavit filed in sup
grant stay of all further
PrI. Civil Judge (senior d
in the interest of justice a
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
HE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUAR
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND
SION PETITION NOS: 2573 & 2574/2
ON NO: 2573/2025
MAHESWARI @ SHYAM SUNDER
NALAL MAHESWARI, AGED ABOU
HAM MAHESWARI COLD STORA
ULI ROAD, RAIL PETA, DUGGIRALA
R DISTRICT.
AND
WET, rep by its Prop. Sri Atluri
50 years, Occ Business, R/o. Gud
...R
le 227 of the Constitution of India, pra the grounds filed herein, the High on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma proceedings in O.S.No.311 of 2015 o division) at Gudivada, pending dispos and to pass DESH
RY
DRANATH ROY
MAHESWARI,
UT 68 YEARS,
AGE PRIVATE
VILLAGE AND
...PETITIONER
Sridhar, S/o.
ivada, Krishna
RESPONDENT
aying that in the
Court may be
mstances stated
ay be pleased to
on the file of the
al of the C.R.P.,
CMR,J
C.R.P.Nos.2573 & 2574 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.G VIJAYA BABU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2574/2025
Between:
1. SYAM SUNDAR MAHESWARI @ SHYAM SUNDER MAHESWAR, S/O. LATE RATANALAL MAHESWARI, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, DIRECTOR, SUBHAM MAHESWARI COLD STORAGE PRIVATE
LIMITED, PENUMULI ROAD, RAIL PETA, DUGGIRALA VILLAGE
AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. VARSHIT AQUA WET, Gudivada, REP by its Prop. Sri Atiuri Sridhar, S/o. Basavaiah aged 50 years, Occ Business, R/o. Gudivada, Krishna District
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to beg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition, haying been aggrieved by the order and decree dt. 09.09.2025 passed in I.A.No.360
of 2025 in O.S.No.311 of 2015 on file of the PrI. Civil Judge (Senior Division)
at Gudivada,
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the PrI. Civil Judge (senior division) at Gudivada, pending disposal of the C.R.P., in the interest of justice and to pass
CMR,J
C.R.P.Nos.2573 & 2574 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.G VIJAYA BABU
CMR,J
C.R.P.Nos.2573 & 2574 of 2025
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Heard Mr. J.Janaki Rami Reddy learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.Vijaya Babu, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. As the order dated 09.09.2025 passed in I.A.No.362 of 2025 in O.S.No.311 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gudivada, receiving the documents in question, is confirmed in C.R.P.No.2572 of 2025, these civil revision petition Nos.2573 and 2574 of 2025 relating to reopening the evidence and recalling the P.W.1 for further examination are also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Date: 23.01.2026 MDP