Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16178/2018 of M. CHAKRAPANI Vs The State of A.P. on 22 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16178/2018 Between: 1. M. CHAKRAPANI, S/O.S/O.M.RAMANJANEYULU, AGE. 39 YEARS,
APHC010348722018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16178/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M. CHAKRAPANI, S/O.S/O.M.RAMANJANEYULU, AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O.1-21, RAJA STREET, LEPAKSHI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRY. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAM.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, CHILAMATHUR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring (i) the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in including the land in Sy.No. 327(327-C) an extent of Ac.3.80 cents of Konduru Village, Lepkashi Mandal, Anantapur District in the prohibition list under sec.22 -A(1)(a) of Registration Act, 1908 (ii) the action of the 4th respondent in refusing to register the sale deed relating to the land in Sy.No. 327(327-C) an extent of Ac.3.80 cents of Konduru Village, Lepkashi Mandal, Anantapur District 'vide refusal order dt. 16-05-2017 is illegal, arbitrary and in
JS, J W.P.No.16178/2018
violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to register the sale deed relating to the land in Sy.No. 327(327-C) an extent of Ac.3.80 cents of Konduru Village, Lepkashi Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to register the sale deed relating to the land in Sy.No. 327(327-C) an extent of Ac.3.80 cents of Konduru Village, Lepkashi Mandal, Anantapur District in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.16178/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.01.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16178/2018
Date: 23.01.2026 rsd