Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14100/2014 of Vommi Rama Murty Chits and Investments (Pvt) Ltd, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, rep: by its Secretary, Home on 22 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 14100/2014 Between: 1. VOMMI RAMA MURTY CHITS AND INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD,,

APHC010497912014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3207]

FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 14100/2014

Between:

1. VOMMI RAMA MURTY CHITS AND INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD,, KANCHARAPALEM REP. BY VOMMI SRINIVASA RAO S/O LATE

RAMACHANDRA

RAO,

D.NO.

36-46-37,

KANCHARAPALEM,

VISHAKAPATNAM.

2. VOMMI RAMA MURTY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY REP., BY VOMMI

NARAYANA

S/O

MADHUSUDANA

RAO,

D.NO.

36-46-37,

KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM.

3. VOMMI

RAMA

MURTHY

MEDICINAL

&

AROMATICAL

PLANTATION, REP. BY VOMMI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE

RAMACHANDRA

RAO,

D.NO.

36-46-37,

KANCHARAPALEM,

4. V.R. AGRO FARMS & HOUSES, REP. BY V. SRINIVASA RAO D.NO.

36-46-37, KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNARRI

5. VISHNU INFOTECH, REP. BY V. SRINIVASA RAO D.NO. 36-46-37, KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM

6. VONUNI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, D.NO.

56-1-69, KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM.

7. VOMMI RAMA NARAYANA, S/O MADHUSUDANA RAO, D.NO. 56-1- 69, KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM.

8. B.V.

RAMESH

CHANDRA,

DIRECTOR,

V.R.

CHITS

&

INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD, D.NO. 56-1-69, KANCHARAPALEM,

9. VOMMI KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE RAMANA MURTHY, D.NO. 56-1- 69, KANCHARAPALEM, VISHAKAPATNAM.

10. VOMMI ANASUYAMMA, D/O LATE RAMA MURTHY, D.NO. 56-1-69,, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY HOME, (GENERAL-B) DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD.

2. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER ANDHRA PRADESH

PROTECTION, OF DEPOSITORS OF FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS

ACT (ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE) C.I.D., HYDERABAD

3. SRI T KRISHNA PRASAD ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF

POLICE, C.I.D., HYDERABAD

4. SRI K SURYA RAO SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT OF SENIOR

CIVIL, JUDGE, ANAKAPALLE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT

5. MS L VIJAYA SHANTHI SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR K R R C, VISAKHAPATNAM.

6. SRI

R

NAGESWAR

RAO

ADMINISTRATIVE

OFFICER

VISAKHAPATNAM,

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY,

VISAKHAPATNAM

7. SRI B RAMANA MURTHY INSPECTOR OF POLICE C I D, VISAKHAPATNAM

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction declaring the Auction and Sale held by the Respondents on 12/10/2012 )n respect of a total extent of 1555.56 Sq.Yards of vacant commercial plot bearing Survey No. 40, Plot C-24, Industrial Estate, Kapparada Village, Kancherlapalem, Vishakapatnam as ultravires, arbitrary,

illegal and as unjust and issue a consequential direction setting aside the said auction and sale in respect of the subject property IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 17566 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions directing the Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 to stay all further actions pursuant to the sale and auction of the subject property of an extent of 1555.56 sq. yards of vacant commercial plot bearing Survey No. 40, Plot C-24, Industrial Estate, Kapparada Village, Kancherlapalem, Visakhapatnam on 12/10/2012 by maintain status-quo pending disposal of the above Writ petition and in respect of the subject property.

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. C SINDHU KUMARI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION No.14100 of 2014

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri S. Satyanarayana Prasad, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this writ petition, it has become infructuous.

2. The statement of the learned Senior Counsel is placed on record.

3. In view of the same, the writ petitioner is dismissed as infructuous.

4. No order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

_____________________________

JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 23.01.20296 PGR

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

W.P.No.14100 of 2014

Date: 23.01.2026

PGR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead