Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1909/2018 of Kodru Venkata Satya Narayana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1909/2018 Between: 1. KODRU VENKATA SATYA NARAYANA, S/O LATE BRAHMANNA, AGED
APHC010044732018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1909/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KODRU VENKATA SATYA NARAYANA, S/O LATE BRAHMANNA, AGED 68 YEARS, H.NO.24-28/4-14, GANAPATHI RAO STREET, DURGAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. KODRU LAXMI,, W/O VENKATA SATYA NARAYANA AGED 56 YEARS, H.NO.24-28/4-14, GANAPATHI RAO STREET, DURGAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CAMP AT VIJAYAWADA.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, GANDHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-2, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE SSR AND CVR COLLEGE, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL VELAGA JOSHI, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. .
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction or writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 3 to 5 in trying to stop the construction inspite of the sanctioned plan and the Civil Court decree in OS.No.79/1973 which was conformed . AS.No.1159/1979 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, intentional without notice and opportunity and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to take any forceable steps against the petitioner at the instance of 5th respondent in the interests of Justice and pass all necessary orders for the said purpose. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with the construction of the petitioners in pursuance of their sanctioned plan Permit No.1073/2814/B/VMC/MAC/ 2017, dated 30.12.2017 at NTS No. 39/2, Revenue ward No. 16, Block No. 9, of Machavaram, Vijayawada, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass all necessary orders for the said purpose. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K V BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri K. Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel, representing Sri K.V. Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1909/2018
Dated: 21.01.2026 KAS