Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1073/2018 of Cherukuri Lakshmi Vs Secy., Revenue dept., on 20 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1073/2018 Between: 1. CHERUKURI LAKSHMI, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. COOLI,

APHC010018622018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1073/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CHERUKURI LAKSHMI, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. COOLI, R/O.SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

2. BONIGI SRIRAMAMURTHI,, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE,

GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

3. KASIMKOTA APPALANARASAMMA,, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. LAGUDU RAMANAMMA,, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O. SY.NO.141, AGANAMPUDI VILLAGE,

GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. SECY REVENUE DEPT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S):

JS,J W.P.No.1073/2018

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No. 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites covered by possession certificate issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution on India and to consequently direct the respondent NO.3 not to interfere with residential sites of the petitioner in an extent of 60 Sq.yards each in Sy.N0.141 of Aganampudi Village, Visakhapatnam District covered by Possession Certificate NO.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites admeasuring 60Sq.Yareds each in Sy.No.141 of Aganampudi village, Visakhapatman District covered by Possession Certificate Nos.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014 pendig disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.1073/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…..to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No. 3 in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their residential sites covered by possession certificate issued by the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution on India and to consequently direct the respondent NO.3 not to interfere with residential sites of the petitioner in an extent of 60 Sq.yards each in Sy.N0.141 of Aganampudi Village, Visakhapatnam District covered by Possession Certificate NO.49817, 49813, 19816 and 49315 dated 14.11.2014…”

Heard both the learned counsel.

During the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides consented to dispose the writ petition by making interim order absolute.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is hereby disposed of and the interim order granted by this Court on 05.01.2018 is made absolute. However, the respondents are at liberty to follow the due procedure of law if any action is to be taken against the petitioners. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 21.01.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1073/2018

Dated: 21.01.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead