WP/4343/2018 of Parthapu Penchalaiah, Vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 18 January 2026

1. PARTHAPU PENCHALAIAH,, S/O GURAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

2. KENDRI CHINNA VENKATAIAH,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

3. DARALA GURAVAMA, W/O BISHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RIO R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

4. DARLA DURGAMMA, W/O DARLA YENDUKONDAIU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RIO GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

5. PARLA POLAMMA, W/O OSURI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

6. PARTAPU GURAVAMMA, W/O GURAVAIAH AGED AOUT 46 YEARS. R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

7. PEDALA BUJJAMMA, W/O KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RIO GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

8. PADATAPU SRINU, S/O NALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O

GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

9. PARTHAPU BUJJAMMA, W/O KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RIO GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

10. DARLA PEDDA VENKAIAH, W/O PENCHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

11. DARLA RAMUDU, S/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

12. DARLA SEENAIAH,, W/O CHALAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

13. DARLA PENCHALAMMA, W/O DARLA CHINNA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RIO GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM,

14. PARDATAPU VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RIO GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

15. DARLA GURAVAIAH, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

16. MUNGI ESWARAMMA, W/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

17. PARDATAPU PENCHALAIAH, S/O SEENAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

18. PARDATAPU BULLEMMA, S/O BAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

19. PADATAPU KAMAKSHAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM,

20. PEDALA KOTAIAH, S/O VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O GANDHI GIRJINA COLONY, VENKATESPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE (LAND ACQUISITION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER NELLORE RURAL MANDAL,

5. THE NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner houses and huts with an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents comprised in Sy.no 2005/C2 of Nellore Bit-II, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and in proposed to widen the road through petitioners huts without acquiring petitioners property and without paying compensation in accordance with law as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner land with an extent of Ac. 1.50 cents comprised in Sy.no 2005/C2 of Nellore Bit-II, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner houses and huts with an extent of 1.50 cents comprised in Sy.no 2005/C2 of Nellore Bit-II, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without following due process of law in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 22-2-2018 in I.A.No. 1 of 2018 in WP.No.4343 of 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)

2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO

The Court made the following ORDER:

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: …to issue a Writ, order or Orders more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner houses and huts with an extent of Ac.1.50 cents comprised in Sy.No.2005/C2 of Nellore Bit-II, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and in proposed to widen the road through petitioners huts without acquiring petitioners property and without paying compensation in accordance with law as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner land with an extent of Ac.1.50 cents comprised in Sy.No.2005/C2 of Nellore Bit-II, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders…

2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that the petitioners were allotted house site pattas. Hence, no further orders are required in the writ petition.

3. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition stands closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 19.01.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 4343/2018

Dated: 19.01.2026 KAS