Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/458/2015 of KANAMALLA S.S. SUVARCHALA DEVI, GUNTUR DIST. Vs P.P., HYD & ANO on 7 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 458/2015 Between: 1. KANAMALLA S.S. SUVARCHALA DEVI, W/O
APHC010040302015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 458/2015
Between:
1. KANAMALLA S.S. SUVARCHALA DEVI, W/O N.RAVINDRA KUMAR, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC: RETD. TEACHER, MPP.ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, VEDULLAPALLI, BAPATLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
.AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
2. CHILAKALA RAVINDRA REDDY, S/O VEERA REDDY, R/O REDLA
BAZAAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTINCT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KODURU BUJJI BABU
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
3. 00
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 458/2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. Report submitted by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is taken on record.
2. The report is appended with a death certificate of the petitioner. It appears from the death certificate that the petitioner has expired on 11.10.2016.
3. It appears that the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against an order of conviction dated 24.01.2014 passed by the learned Court Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Railways, Guntur in CCNo.103 of 2013 for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which was affirmed by the appellate Court i.e., III Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur vide Judgment in Criminal Appeal No.15 of 2014 dated 19.03.2015, wherein both the Courts below found the petitioner to be guilty for such offence. Since the petitioner being accused has already expired, nothing left in the instant Criminal Revision Case to decide. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
4. In the result, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA KS Dated:8.01.2026.
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.458 OF 2015
DATED:08.01.2026.
KS