Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1671/2015 of K. SATYANARAYANA ACHARI, ANANTHAPUR DIST. & 3 OTHRS Vs P.P., HYD on 7 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1671/2015 Between: 1. K. SATYANARAYANA ACHARI, ANANTHAPUR DIST. & 3
APHC010085922015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1671/2015
Between:
1. K. SATYANARAYANA ACHARI, ANANTHAPUR DIST. & 3
OTHRS, S/O. K. SUDERSHAN ACHARI R/O. NEAR GEETHA
TALKIES GUNTAKAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
2. K. SUDERSHAN ACHARI, S/O. HANUMANTHAPPA R/O. NEAR
GEETHA TALKIES GUNTAKAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
3. K. UMADEVI, W/O. K. SUDERSHAN ACHARI R/O. NEAR
GEETHA TALKIES GUNTAKAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
4. SOUBHAGYA
LAKSHMI,
W/O.
RAGHAVENDRA
D/O.
K.
SUDERSHAN ACHARI R/O. SHAREEF NAGAR KURNOOL
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. P P HYD, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tofiled under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 13.08.2015
made in Crl.A.No.83 of 2013 on the file of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni, confirming the conviction and sentence dated 08.04.2013 passed in C.C.no.332 of 2010 on the file fo the Judicial Magistrate of First CLass, Yemmiganur.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2636 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of Judgment dated 08.04.2013 in C.C.No.332 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yemmiganur, in the ends of justice.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 2643 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail by suspending the sentence made in Crl.A.No.83 of 2013 on the file of the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni, pending disposal of Crl.R.C. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. U RAMANJANEYULU
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1671 OF 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Inspite of the matter is being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. The instant criminal revision case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed against the judgment dated 13.08.2015, passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni, in Crl.A.No.83 of 2013, whereby the learned Sessions Judge confirmed the judgment dt.08.04.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Yemmiganur, in C.C. No.332 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A read with 34 IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two years each and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each for the offence under section 498-A IPC. They are also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year each and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each for the offence under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. I have perused the order passed by the learned Trial Court.
4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has convicted and sentenced the petitioners to undergo simple imprisonment for two years each and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each for the offence under section 498-A IPC. They are also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year each and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month each for the offence under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction and sentence has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the parties has also been scanned.
5. On a careful perusal of the observation of the learned Trail Court, it appears that the Trial Court has specifically decided the grounds of Petition as mentioned by the Petitioner, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial Court.
7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference.
8. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 08.01.2026 BV