Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16936/2022 of Smt K. S. Satyavathi, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 16936/2022 Between: 1. SMT
APHC010285662022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16936/2022
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT K. S. SATYAVATHI,, W/O A.K.D,V.P. MURTHY AGED 71 YEARS, OCC SCHOOL ASSISTANT (RETIRED) NATURAL SCIENCE, Z.P. HIGH.SCHOOL, BENDAPUDI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RIO C- I, SAVAITHRI SUNDAY
APARTMENTS, OPP. VETERIRIARY HOSPITAL, RAMARAOPETA, ICAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOLEDUCATION DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA. PRADESH, FBRAHIMPATHARN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, ICAKINADA,
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.16936 of 2022
EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., HYDERABAD-500004.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order -or Direction, more particularly one in the nature. of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the action of the respondents in not in not releasing the service benefits such as pay fixation, increment, seniority rand other attendant benefits as per the directions of Honorable Tribunal vide Order dated 23.07.2013 in 0A.No.9745 of 2011 and also in terms of the Orders of the Honorable Tribunal dated 06.06.2017 in OA.No.1667 of 2015 is tillegal arbftrary, unjust, improper, contrary to law and in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 20 and 300-A Constitution of India and consequently the direct the respondents to release the service benefits of the petitioner with interest and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to implement the orders/ directions of the Honble Tribunal dated 23.07.2013 in OA.No.9745 of 2011 and dated 06.06.2017 in OA.No.1667 of 2015 forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra The Court made the following:
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.16936 of 2022
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) Learned Government Pleader for Services-III, appearing for the respondents, submits that the entire amount due to the petitioner has been paid and order of the Tribunal has been complied with. He has also produced a copy of the proceedings of the District Education Officer, Kakinada district, to that effect.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the services of the petitioner for a period of ten years as ordered by the Tribunal was regularized and that arrears relating to pension and other service benefits are completely paid. However, he submits that no amount was paid relating to the ten years period that was regularized.
3. There is no order passed by the Tribunal to make any payment for the said ten years period. Only direction to regularize the service for the ten years period was given. Therefore, the petitioner prays for liberty to take steps according to law to claim for the pay relating to the said period of ten years which was regularized.
4. Granting liberty as prayed for and recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents that the order of the Tribunal has been complied with, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J
________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 08-01-2026 BMS