Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1663/2015 of SHAIK RAFI, W.G.DT., Vs STATE OF AP., REP PP., on 7 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1663/2015 Between: 1. SHAIK RAFI, S/O. ABDUL MUNAF, AGED
APHC010369082015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1663/2015
Between:
1. SHAIK RAFI, S/O. ABDUL MUNAF, AGED 36 YEARS, TRANSPORT
BUSINESS, NALLAJARLA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF AP REP PP, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1663/2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. It appears that against the finding of an order of conviction and sentence passed by the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kovvur in CCNo.256 of 2013 dated 01.09.2014 which was affirmed by the appellate Court i.e., IX Additional Sessions Judge, at Kovvur in Criminal Appeal No.170 of 2014 dated 21.07.2015 for the offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred.
3. I have perused the order passed by the learned Trial Court.
4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court convicted and sentenced the petitioner to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one (01) year and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only), in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for one (01) month for the offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. In the judgment of conviction it also mentioned the evidentiary value of the witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the parties has also been scanned.
5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Trail Court, it appears that the Trial Court has specifically decided the grounds for convicting the Petitioner and he has also decided on the point for determination. The same was affirmed by the appellate court also. Hence, I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.
6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Trial Court which was affirmed by the learned Appellate Court.
7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA KS Dated:8.01.2026.
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1663 OF 2015
DATED:08.01.2026.
KS