Andhra Pradesh High Court

FCA/114/2010 of LINGAM DIVAKARA RAO Vs SANKU GEETHA & LINGAM GEETHA & ANOTHER on 6 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 114/2010 Between:

APHC010233962010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 114/2010

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. LINGAM DIVAKARA RAO, S/O. MOHAN RAO UN EMPLOYEE G-4, MADHUBAN HEIGHTS VIDYUTH COLONY, RAJAHMUNDRY PRESENTLY R/O.KVR MURTHY D.NO.45-48-23/1, ABID NAGAR

...APPELLANT AND

1. SANKU GEETHA LINGAM GEETHA ANOTHER, D/O. SANKU HARI, W/O. L.DIVAKARA RAO D.NO.6-124/2, PATTUSALI STREET, PAYAKARAOPETA-53126 VIZAG DIST

2. LINGAM HARIKA MAHANVITHA, D/O. L.DIVAKARA RAO MINOR, REP.Y MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT D.NO.6-124/2, PATTUSALI STREET, PAYAKARAOPETA-53126 VIZAG DIST

...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 289 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order passed in MC.No.163/2008 on the file of the Family Court cum Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry dated 04/03/2010 till the disposal of the appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2010(FCAMP 351 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased extend further time of 4 weeks to deposit the amount as directed in the order dated 29.04.2010 in FCAMP No.289/2010 in FCA No.114/2010 Counsel for the Appellant:

1. S CHAKRAPANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.114 of 2010 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Mr. S.Chakrapani, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this appeal, this Family Court Appeal has become infructuous.

2. The statement of the learned counsel for the appellant is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

__________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

Date:07.01.2026 SCS

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.114 of 2010

Dt.07.01.2026 SCS/SA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead