Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/102/2010 of PANCHADARALA RAMU, VISAKHAPATNAM Vs PANCHADARAAL VARALAKSHMI, NEW GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM on 6 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO:
APHC010221762010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 102/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PANCHADARALA RAMU, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O. GANGANNA POLICE CONSTABLE R/O. QR.NO. III BLOCK C8, POLICE QUARTERS, STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...APPELLANT AND
1. PANCHADARAAL VARALAKSHMI NEW GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM, W/o. Ramu R/o. D.No. 9-2--42, Pentaiah Marg, New Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENT Appeal has been filed against orders to set aside the decree and order dated 25-01-2010 passed in O.P.No. 809 of 2008 by the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam by allowing the F.C.A.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the decree in order in O.P.No. 809 of 2008, dated 25-01-2010 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the FCA.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased extend the time limit to deposit the arrear amount by four weeks by permitting the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- towards part of arrear amount of maintenance payable to the respondent herein in the above FCA No.102/2010
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent:
1. GODA RAMALAKSHMI The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.102 of 2010 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
Sri S.V.R.Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per his instructions both the parties settled the issue amicably out of the Court and as such, no further adjudication is required in the present appeal.
2. Recording the statement of the learned counsel for the appellant, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Dated: 07.01.2026 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.102 of 2010
Dated: 07.01.2026 TM