Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/91/2026 of Ayub Khan Pathan Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre, on 5 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 91/2026 Between:
APHC010710372025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
WRIT PETITION NO: 91/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. AYUB KHAN PATHAN, S/O PATAN ABDULLA KHAN, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC TRANSPORT BUSINESS, D. NO 52-6-635, 5TH LINE, GUNTURI VARI THOTA, BUS STAND (GUNTUR) S.O, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522001.
...PETITIONER AND
1. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2ND FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI-110003.
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), GUNTUR, INCOME TAX OFFICE, LAKSHMIPURAM MAIN ROAD, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522006
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the notice u/s 148 dated 08.04.2022 vide DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1042669338(1) issued by the JAO (Respondent No.2) instead of Respondent No.1/(FAO) for A.Y.2015-16 as void. illegal and contrary to the provisions of Income-tax Act and contrary to the Constitutional Provisions including Principles of Natural Justice and pass such
IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the notice u/s 148 dated 08.04.2022 vide DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_172022-23/1042669338(1) issued by the JAO (Respondent No.2) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) for A.Y.2015-16, pending disposal of the subject writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V N HARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
WRIT PETITION No.91 of 2026 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the notice u/s.148 dated
08.04.2022 vide DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022- 23/1042669338(1) issued by the JAO (Respondent No.2) instead of Respondent No.1/(FAO) for A.Y.2015-16 as void, illegal and contrary to the provisions of Income-tax Act and contrary to the Constitutional Provisions including Principles of Natural Justice and pass such…”
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department.
Perused the record.
The issue raised in the present Writ Petition is the subject matter in the case of Smt. Parameela Pasumarthi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-II, Vijayawada and another wherein this Court allowed W.P.No.14681 of 2023 and batch and held as herein under:
“Considering the background in notifying the (E-Assessment Scheme of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022) notified by the Government of India on 29.03.2022, and in the light of the decisions of various High Courts stated supra and upon careful consideration of the contentions raised by the learned counsel appearing on either side, we hold that the impugned notices and orders which have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, or outside the faceless mechanism as provided under the provisions of Section 144 (b) read with Section 151 A and the “E-Assessment Scheme of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022” notified by the Government of India on 29.03.2022 under Section 151 A, is bad and illegal. It is made clear that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (“JAO”) had no jurisdiction to issue the impugned orders/notices.”
5) Since the issue is covered by the order of this Court, dated 28.10.2025 in W.P.No.14681 of 2023 and batch, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the said order.
6) There shall be no order as to costs.
7) Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Registry to append a copy of the order in W.P.No.14681 of 2023 and batch, to this order. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 06.01.2026 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
WRIT PETITION No.91 of 2026
Dated: 06.01.2026 TM