Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/623/2020 of MOHD AHMEDUNNISA Vs MOHD KHASIM on 5 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 623/2020 Between: 1. MOHD AHMEDUNNISA, W/O LATE MOHD ABDUL
APHC010091702020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 623/2020
Between:
1. MOHD AHMEDUNNISA, W/O LATE MOHD ABDUL BASID, AGED. 65
YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O. PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND
POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 533242
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MOHD KHASIM, S/O. LATE LALJAN, AGED ABOUT. 61 YEARS, OCC.
DEFACTO HEREDITARY MUTAWALLI, OF DARGAH RESIDENT OF
PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 533242
2. ABID ALI, S/O LATE AGHA JAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT. 50
YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. OPPOSITE SUNNI MASJ ID, MUSLIM
STREET, NAGARAM VILLAGE AND POST MAMIDIKUDURU
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST,
...RESPONDENT(S):
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 172/2020
Between:
1. ABID ALI, S/O. LATE AGHA JAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS, OCC- BUSINCSS, R/O.OPP- SUNNI.MASJID, MUSLIM
STREET, NAGARAM VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MOHD KHASIM ALI, S/O.LATE LALJAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC- DEFACTO
HEREDITARY
MUTAWALI
OF
DARGAH,
R/O.PASARLAPUDI
VILLAGE
AND
POST,
MAMIDIKUDURU
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533 247
2. SMT MOHD AHMED UNNISA, W/O.LATE MOHD. ABDUL BASID, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.PASARLAPUDI
VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT - 533 247
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the orders passed in O.S. No. 2 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Tribunal, at Hyderabad dated. 26.11.2019
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A M QURESHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KALEPU YASHWANTH
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS: 623 of 2020 & 172 of 2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
1. The memo was placed on record on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 contending interaila that respondent No.1 has expired.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant Civil Revision petition has no cause of action at present. So, he does not want to proceed further. It appears from the record, the suit pending before learned Andhra Pradesh State WAQF Tribunal at Hyderabad has already been dismissed for default by an Order dated 15.03.2024.
3. Considering the submission of the petitioner, the instant Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:06.01.2026. SSA/CMK