Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11548/2019 of Kolasani Srinivas Security Agency Vs Government of India, on 5 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11548/2019 Between: 1. KOLASANI SRINIVAS SECURITY AGENCY, REP., BY IS PROPRIETOR, COL.
APHC010255892019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11548/2019
Between:
1. KOLASANI
SRINIVAS
SECURITY
AGENCY,
REP.,
BY
IS
PROPRIETOR, COL. K. SRINIVAS (RETD.,) S/O VENKATESWARA
RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.3-28-18/112, FLAT
NO.102, YAGANTI NIVAS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REP., BY ITS
SPECIAL SECRETARY, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI.
2. DIRECTORATE
GENERAL
RESETTLEMENT,
MINISTRY
OF
DEFENCE REP., BY ITS JOINT DIRECTOR WEST BLOCK-4, R.K.
PURAM, NEW DELHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.
2112/SA/UP/4138/AP/Emp/2019,
dated
1.8.2019
issued
by
the
2nd
respondent authority, as arbitrary, illegal, null and void against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the respondent authorities to continue the empanelment of the petitioner agency with the 2nd respondent authority for sponsorship of providing security guards to the empanelled departments of the 2nd respondent authority and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the proceedings No.
2112/SA/UP/4138/AP/Emp/ 2019, dated 1.8.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent authority, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to continue the petitioners services for the security agencies awarded in favour of the petitioner till the age of 60
years in pursuance of the 1st respondent scheme dated 09-07-2012 and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed respondents 3 to 11 , as respondents 3 to 11 in the above W.P. No. 11548 of 2019 and in I.A. No. 1 of 2020 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms. S. Akhila, learned counsel, representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11548/2019
Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS