Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/762/2019 of Appa Rao Bobbili Vs UNION OF INDIA on 5 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 762/2019 Between: 1. A RAO BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA,
APHC010017272019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 762/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A RAO BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased stay of the operation of the impugned order dated 08.09.2017 published by the respondents which was uploaded in the website of the Respondent No.1 with Sr. No. 14319, by activating the DIN No. 01985362 and digital signature of the Petitioner, in so far as the Petitioner herein is concerned, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Gundala Siva Prasad Reddy, learned counsel, representing Smt. Vanga Anita, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 762/2019
Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS