Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/392/2019 of K NAGA LAKSHMI and 378 others Vs The Manager on 5 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 392/2019 Between: 1. K NAGA LAKSHMI AND 378 OTHERS, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE
APHC010007722019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 392/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K NAGA LAKSHMI AND 378 OTHERS, GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE MANAGER, Chaitanya Godavari Gramena Bank, Vatticherukuru Branch, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct any crop insurance premium from the Loans released and to be released from the petitioners and Members of petitioners in Khariff and rabbi seasons 2018 to 2019 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT.
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri T. Satyanarayana, learned counsel, representing Sri T.V.V. Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 392/2019
Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS