Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/28945/2021 of GUJJALA RAVI Vs UNION OF INDIA on 5 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 28945/2021 Between: 1. GUJJALA RAVI, S/O. RAMULU, AGED. 32 YEARS, OCC. R.P.F
APHC010482862021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 28945/2021
Between:
1. GUJJALA RAVI, S/O. RAMULU, AGED. 32 YEARS, OCC. R.P.F
CONSTABLE, R/O. RAILWAY QUARTERS, RAJ AHMUNDRY, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, INDIAN RAILWAYS, RAIL
BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, NEW
DELHI.
3. THE
POST
COMMANDER,
RAILWAY
PROTECTION
FORCE,
RAJAHMUNDRY POST.
4. THE
ASST
SECURITY
COMMISSIONER
AND
DISCIPLINARY
AUTHORITY, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, RAJ AHMUNDRY.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in initiating disciplinary proceedings against me pursuant to Charge sheet dated 24- 11-2021 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unauthorized, without jurisdiction, irrational and void apart from being violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently grant stay of disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner until the conclusion of the criminal trial in FIR No. 409/2021of Rajahmundry II Town Police Station and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to stay the disciplinary proceedings pursuant to charge sheet dated 24-11-2021and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VIVEK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. J U M V PRASAD (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
2. .
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri P.Vivek, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 06.01.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO:28945 of 2021 Dated: 06.01.2026
ANI