Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2980/2025 of J. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy Vs Sri G. Sai Prasad, I.A.S., on 4 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2980/2025 Between: 1. J. VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY, S/O. BHASKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
APHC010542392025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2980/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. J. VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY, S/O. BHASKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT
YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, MARKAPUR, DANMADUGU VILLAGE, MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,
(WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI R GOPALA KRISHNA I A S, THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR, KORGRP AND PSVP, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. SRI MURALI NATH REDDY, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF IRRIGATION, WATER RESOURCES DEPT., VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. SRI ABHUTHALIM, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CONSTRUCTION CIRCLE ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. SRI CH SRINIVASA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, INVESTIGATION DIVISION CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent/contemnor by invoking the provisions of sections 10 to 12 of the contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful wanton and deliberate disobedience of the orders of the Honble Court dated 03.04.20245 in WP.NO. 26263 of 2024 in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PATHI SIVA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. T S RAYALU
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2980/2025
Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS