Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3235/2025 of Sri Ankam Sinivasa Subba Rao, Vs ANJANEYA PRASAD on 4 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3235/2025 Between: 1. SRI ANKAM SINIVASA SUBBA RAO,, S/O. LAXMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53
APHC010586182025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3235/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI ANKAM SINIVASA SUBBA RAO,, S/O. LAXMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC. CIVIL CONTRACTOR,' R/O. BALAJI NAGAR, TANGELLA MUDI, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. ANJANEYA PRASAD, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. KODALI BABU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. SRINIVASS VENDRA, D/O. NOT KNOWN, OCC DIRECTOR, WORKS ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately disobeying the order of this Honble Court passed in W.P.No.7486 of 2025 dated 01.04.2025
by not obeying the same and for his conduct in bringing down the dignity and majesty of this Honble Court and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3235/2025
Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS