Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/427/2020 of GOKANAKONA MANDAIAH Vs MOLARTHI RAJA RAO on 4 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 427/2020 Between: 1. GOKANAKONA MANDAIAH, S/ O JAGANNADHA
APHC010060272020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 427/2020
Between:
1. GOKANAKONA MANDAIAH, S/ O JAGANNADHA RAO, AGED ABOUT
44 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.16-2-18/1, LAKSHMANA RAO STREET, PURNANAANDAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MOLARTHI RAJA RAO, S/O ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O BACKSIDE OF SARADAMBA THEATRE, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DASARI LARA GRACE SAROJINI, D/O VANDNAM, AGED ABOUT 64
YEARS, EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT BACK SIDE OF SARADAMBA
THEATER, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SHAIK MEERAVALI, S/O DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING
AT
D.NO.15-6-33,
PANASATHOTA,
NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. BOLLA BRAHMA NAIDU, S/O HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O 60 FEET ROAD, NEAR RAJASEKHAR REDDY
STATUE, PRAKASHNAGAR, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. SHAIK SHOWKATH ALI, S/O SAIDA SAHEB AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING
AT
PRAKASHNAGAR,
NARASARAOPET,
GUNTUR DISTRICT
6. YASANI LAKSHMI BODA LAKSHMI, W/O NARASIMHULU AGED
ABOUT 62 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O PATHURU NEAR OLD
VENKATESWARA
CINEMA
HALL,
NARASARAOPET,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 427/2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. The instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred challenging an Order and Decree dated 12.12.2017 made in I.A.No.1069 of 2014 in O.S.No.222 of 2006 by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District.
2. Sri T.Kuladeep, learned Counsel, representing Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, learned Counsel on record for the Petitioner, submits on instruction that the petitioner does not intend to proceed further with this matter.
3. Recorded the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA KS Dated:05.01.2026.
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.427 OF 2020
DATED:05.01.2026.
KS