Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2086/2025 of P SUBBARAYUDU Vs SRI G SAI PRASAD on 4 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2086/2025 Between: 1. P SUBBARAYUDU, S/O. CHINNAGURAVAIAH VENKATAREDDY PALLI(V),KULLURU
APHC010360492025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2086/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. P SUBBARAYUDU, S/O. CHINNAGURAVAIAH VENKATAREDDY PALLI(V),KULLURU POST,KALUVOYA(M), NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2. SRI CH SRINIVASULU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.,
3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 21.04.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 7178/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2086/2025
Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS