Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4496/2022 of G THULASAMMA Vs KETHAN KARGH on 1 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496/2022 Between: 1. G THULASAMMA, W/O. SURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 50
APHC010550892022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496/2022
Between:
1. G THULASAMMA, W/O. SURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC.
FP SHOP DEALER (SUSPENSION), SHOP NO. 1203006, J.
KOTTAKAT VILLAGE, VIDAPANAKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KETHAN KARGH, JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
2. RAVINDRANATH, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
3. BHRAMMAIAH,
THASILDAR,
VIDAPANAKAL
MANDAL,
ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for contempt of courts of the Hon'ble High court for willful violation of the orders of this Hontle court dated 29.07.2022 passed in W.P. No. 23373 of 2022 by the Lordships Mr. Justice Battu Devanand under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully and intentionally disobeying the orders and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 29.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.23373 of 2022 by the respondents.
2. During the course of hearing today, Mr Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondents has not complied with the orders of this Court in W.P.No.23373 of 2022, dated 29.07.2022 within the time stipulated and subsequently after two (2) months it was complied with. He further submits that in compliance of the order in the writ petition, respondents have also issued the proceedings and the same was challenged before this Court in different Writ Petition.
3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the considered opinion of this Court, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case.
4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. However, it is made clear that the respondents shall be more vigilant and careful in future in implementing the orders of the Court in true letter and spirit.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 02.01.2026 TM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496 OF 2022
Date: 02.01.2026 TM