Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/112/2007 of Gurucharan, S/o. Late P.S. Rao Vs Ponnala Rojaramani, W/o. Gurucharan, on 30 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO:
APHC011264932007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 112/2007
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GURUCHARAN, S/O. LATE P.S. RAO, EMPLOYEE,R/O. 6, JEEVAN JYOTHI ENCLAVE, DAYALBAGH, AGRA, PRESENTLY R/O. D.NO. 117/L/453, CHENNY HOUSE, IST FLOOR, NAVEEN NAGAR, KANPOOR-9. (UTTAR PRADESH).
...APPELLANT AND
1. PONNALA ROJARAMANI W/O GURUCHARAN, Employee, R/o. D.No.4-35-15/A, Saisampath Enclave, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, presently she is in working in Synergies Dooray Automotive Limited, Duvvada, Special Economie Zone, Plot No.3, and 4 Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 194 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 38 days in filing the FCA against the decree and judgment made in OP No.133/2003 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NAKARIKANTI PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.112 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.112 of 2007
Dated: 31.12.2025 TM