Andhra Pradesh High Court

FCA/88/2009 of GANISREEDY SRINIVAS Vs GANIREDDY SRIDEVI on 30 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO:

APHC010004542009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 88/2009

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. GANISREEDY SRINIVAS, S/O.RAMARAO, HINDU EMPLOYEE R/O.H.NO.46-16-33, DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY.

...APPELLANT AND

1. GANIREDDY SRIDEVI, W/o.Srinivas, Hindu Herad Nurse, AIMS R/o.H.No.187-A, 3rd Floor, Arjunnagar, Safdarjang Enclave, Near Kanna Automobiles, New Delhi.

...RESPONDENT Appeal is filed seeking to aside the order dated 14th day of July, 2008 passed by the Judge, Family Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry in OP No.17/2008 and allow the appeal by grant divorce on grounds of desertion and cruelty, as prayed for in the OP No.17/2008 IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 445 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 21 days in filin the FCA Counsel for the Appellant:

1. CH SHANMUKHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:

1. M LAKSHMANA SARMA The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.88 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.

2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.

3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.88 of 2009

Dated: 31.12.2025 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead