Andhra Pradesh High Court

FCA/19/2009 of MARISA RAGHAVA Vs SMT. MARISA AKULA RAJESHWARI on 30 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO:19/2009 Between: 1.

APHC010447012009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3564]

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO:19/2009

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. MARISA RAGHAVA, S/O. RAMA RAO, DRIVER R/O. 39-8-32, MURALI NAGAR, NEAR WALKER PORT,

...APPELLANT AND

1. SMT MARISA AKULA RAJESHWARI, W/o. Marisa Raghava R/o. H.No. 12/83, Opp: to State Bank of India Pendurthi

...RESPONDENT Appeal is filed seeking to set aside the order passed in OP.No.14/2008 dated 29.12.2008 on the file of the Judge, Family court, at Visakhapatnam by allowing the appeal which was filed by the appellant herein for ends of justice and allow the petition filed by the appellant before the honourable Judge Family Court at Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 37 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the fix an early date for hearing of the Family Court Appeal Counsel for the Appellant:

1. S V RAGHUNANDAN Counsel for the Respondent:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.19 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.

2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.

3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.19 of 2009

Dated: 31.12.2025 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead