Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21983/2022 of R ANAND PATNAIK Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 21983/2022 Between: 1. R ANAND PATNAIK, S/O. R. JAGANNADHARAO AGED 58

APHC010363622022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 21983/2022

Between:

1. R ANAND PATNAIK, S/O. R. JAGANNADHARAO AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.1-151, KOTTA AGRAHARAM, CHEEPURUPALLI (V AND P), VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT 535128, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, A.P.

SECRETARIAT,

BUILDING,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATI,

GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE

SPECIAL

COMMISSIONER

FOR

COOPERATION

AND

REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, , AP, D.NO.2-16-83, NEAR

SKYLARK

TOWERS,

11TH

LINE,

SYAMALANAGAR,

GUNTUR-522006.

3. THE CHAIRMAN AND

MANAGING DIRECTOR, , APEPCDL,

VIJAYANAGARAM

4. THE CHEEPURUPALLI RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE SOCIETY

LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CHEEPURUPALLI, VIJAYANAGARAM

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of

Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to retire the petitioner from service w.e.f. 31.07.2022 on attaining the age of 58 years vide RC.N0.1999/REC/CPL/ADM/Estb./Employees/Retirement/D.No.42/2022 ated 19.01.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.102, Dt.27.06.2017

r/w G.O.Ms.No.138, Dt.08.08.2017 and violative of Articles-14, 16 and 21 and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service up to the age of 60 years with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service up to the age of 60 years by suspending the proceedings RC.

NO.1999/REC/CPL/ADM/Estb./Employees/Retirement/D.No.42/2022, dated 19.01.2022 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 29.07.2022 in WP. No. 21983 of 2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders to pay salary pending disposal of main writ petition by modifying the order dated 29-07-2022 in W.P.No.21983 of 2022 as IA.No.1 of 2023 in WP.No. 21983 of 2022, pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to receive the Counter Affidavit on behalf of the 4th respondent on record in the above writ petition WP.No.21983 of 2022,by granting leave and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders in WP.No. 21983 of 2022 dt. 29-07-2022

in IA.No. 1/2022 as extended by orders dt. 26-08-2022, 23-09-2022, 11-10- 2022, 18-11-2022, 22-12-2022, 25-01-223, 22-02-2023 and as modified by orders dt. 08-05-2023 in IA.No. 1/2023 and dismiss the writ petition with costs Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G N UMA RANI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. V V N NARAYANA RAO

2. A VEERASWAMY

3. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

4. GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION NO: 21983 OF 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Ms.G.N.Uma Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter before the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 31.12.2025 Pmk

WRIT PETITION NO:21983 of 2022

Date: 31.12.2025 Pmk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead