Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/797/2008 of SANAPALA RAJULAMMA, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PP., ANOTHER, on 30 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 797/2008 Between: 1. SANAPALA RAJULAMMA,, D/O.
APHC010583242008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 797/2008
Between:
1. SANAPALA RAJULAMMA,, D/O. APPA RAO, CULTIVATION /COOLI, R/O.
LATCHAYYAPETA
VILLAGE,
PONDURU
MANDAL,
SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PP ANOTHER, REP.BY
ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD.
2. TIRLANGI RAMU, S/O. MALLAYYA, KALINGA , LATCHAYYAPETA
VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Crl.RC., against the Judgment in Sessions Case No.134 of 2005 dated 31.1.2006 on the file fo the court of Sessions, Sessions Division, Srikakulam (Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Rajam), IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 1398 OF 2007
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 417 days in filing the Crl.RC., against the Judgment in Sessions Case No.134 of 2005 dated 31.1.2006 on the file fo the court of Sessions, Sessions Division, Srikakulam (Assistant Sessions Judge's Court, Rajam), Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A RAVI SHANKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K PURUSHOTHAM
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.797 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. On 10.12.2025, the SHO concerned was directed to submit a report regarding the status of the petitioner.
2. In terms of the direction, Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponduru Police Station submitted a report. It appears from the report that the petitioner and her family members died due to genetical disorder. As there are no surviving members of the family, it is not possible to collect the death certificate of the petitioner.
3. On perusing the report and considering the matter, it appears that the petitioner has expired.
4. Since the petitioner has already been expired, it is not necessary to proceed with this case.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Dated: 31.12.2025. SCS
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.797 of 2008
DATED: 31.12.2025.
SCS