Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5770/2023 of CH CHALAMAIAH Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 30 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 5770/2023 Between: 1. CH CHALAMAIAH, S/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 52
APHC010113972023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5770/2023
Between:
1. CH
CHALAMAIAH,
S/O.VENKATESWARLU,
AGED
ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.DHULIPUDI
VILLAGE, NAGARAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
PANCHAYAT
RAJ,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY - FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER SE, PR CIRCLE - BAPATLA, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, BAPATLA, BAPATLA
DISTRICT.
5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ
DEPARTMENT, PR DIVISION, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.
6. PAY
AND
ACCOUNTS
OFFICE,
NARASARAOPET,
BAPATLA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in not making the payment for the two works covered under the M-Book No.644- B/14-15 in agreement No.71/2018-19, dated 3.9.2018 and M- Book No.54-B/17-18 in Agreement No . . ../2018-19, dated 3.9.2018 for providing internal CC Roads in the limits of Dhulipudi Gram Panchayat of Nagaram Mandal, Guntur District for the total bill amount Rs.13,63,323/- (Rs.9,29,270/- and Rs.4,34,053/-) as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to clear the bills submitted by the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to pay the amount covered under the respective orders passed in the M-books for the total bill amount Rs.13,63,323/- (Rs.9,29,270/- and Rs.4,34,053/-) for M-Book No.644-B/14-15 in agreement No.71/2018-19, dated 3.9.2018 and M-Book No.54-B/17-18 in Agreement No..../2018- 19, dated 3.9.2018 for providing internal CC Roads in the limits of Dhulipudi Gram Panchayat of Nagaram Mandal, Guntur District to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B V ANJANEYULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
The Court made the following:
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amount to the petitioner for the works executed in connection with providing internal CC roads in the limits of Dhulipudi Gram Panchayat, Nagaram Mandal, Guntur District, the present writ petition is filed.
2. Heard Sri B.V. Aanjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader reported that as against the claim made by the petitioner to a tune of Rs.13,63,323/-, the authorities have admitted and paid an of amount of Rs.13,58,171/-.
4. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner requested to record the said submission and prayed to close the writ petition with a liberty to file an application if the petitioner is still aggrieved.
5. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. If at all the petitioner still feels that the cause in the writ petition survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 31.12.2025 ANS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5770/2023 Date: 31.12.2025 ANS