Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/169/2008 of SRI PODUGU BHANU PRAKASH Vs SMT.PODUGU DRAKSHAYANI on 30 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 169/2008 Between:
APHC010589582008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3564]
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 169/2008
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI PODUGU BHANU PRAKASH, S/O.BULLI BABU, HINDU R/O.D.NO.12-19-3, SAINAGAR, PHOOL BAGH ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT PODUGU DRAKSHAYANI, D/o.Chenna Narasimha Murthy, Hindu R/o.D.No.20-60-6, Sabarinagar, Relli Veedhi, Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2008(FCAMP 344 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of the execution of the decree dated 13.08.2008 passed by the Family Court, Visakhapatnam in OP No.659/2004 pending disposal of the appeal Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.169 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.169 of 2008
Dated: 31.12.2025 TM