Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/2065/2011 of MANDARAPU PREM SAGAR Vs MANDARAPU VEERA VENKATA BRAHMARAMBICA & THE STATE OF A.P. on 30 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2065/2011 Between: 1. MANDARAPU PREM SAGAR, S/O LATE KAMESWARA
APHC010190352011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2065/2011
Between:
1. MANDARAPU PREM SAGAR, S/O LATE KAMESWARA RAO, TELUGURAJUGARI STREET, BEHIND Z.P.HIGH SCHOOL, TANUKU, W.G.DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MANDARAPU VEERA VENKATA BRAHMARAMBICA THE STATE OF
A P, W/O PREM SAGAR, C/O KOMMOJU VENKATESWARA RAO, D.NO.12-136, DOWLAISWARAM, E.G.DIST.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Crl.R.C., before this Hon'ble Court having aggrieved by the Order in D.V.C.No.1 of 2008, dated 04.03.2011 on the file of the VII Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.172 of 2011, dated 23.08.2011 on the file of the Prl. Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry, E.G.Dist.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order in D.V.C.No.1 of 2008, dated 04.03.2011
on the file of the VII Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.172 of 2011, dated 23.08.2011 on the file of the Prl.
Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry, E.G.Dist.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the orders passed in the above Crl.R.C., by another one week from the date of filing of this petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT CHALLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. NARASIMHA RAO DAVULURI
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2065 of 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has expired.
2. A death certificate of the petitioner is placed on record.
3. It appears from the record that the petitioner has expired on 25.10.2019.
4. The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the Order in D.V.C.No.1 of 2008 on the file of the learned VII Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, which is confirmed in appeal.
5. Since the petitioner has already been expired, it is not necessary to proceed with this case.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Dated: 31.12.2025. SCS
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2065 of 2011
DATED: 31.12.2025.
SCS