Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/132/2009 of J. SRINIVASA MURTHY Vs SMT. JANA PADMAVATHI on 30 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 132/2009 Between:
APHC010210972009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3564]
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 132/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. J. SRINIVASA MURTHY, S/O LATE APPALASWAMY, HINDU R/O D.NO. 9-376 VISAKHAPATNAM-33.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT JANA PADMAVATHI, W/o. Jana Srinivasa Murthy, D/o Manda Srirama Murthy Working as Teacher, Elementary School, Smt. Jana Padmavathi Teacher, Elementary School,
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2006(FCAMP 11 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 60 days caused in filing the appeal Counsel for the Appellant:
1. C V BHANOJI RAMARS Counsel for the Respondent:
1. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.132 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 24.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.132 of 2009
Dated: 31.12.2025 TM