Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/184/2009 of VULLANGULA VEERA VASANTHA RAO, Vs KOYA SURESH BABU, & ANOTHER, on 29 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: 1. VULLANGULA VEERA VASANTHA PEDAKAKANI POST & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. KOYA SURESH BABU CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, 7TH
APHC010281912009
IN TH
TUESDAY,T
TWO
THE HONOURA
CRIMINA
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VULLANGULA VE PEDAKAKANI POS
1. KOYA SURESH CHANDRAMOULI N
2. THE STATE OF PROSECUTOR, HIG Counsel for the Petition
1. O KAILASHNATH R Counsel for the Respon
1. PUBLIC PROSECU The Court made the foll
In pursuance to the the Sub-Inspector of Poli 15.12.2025 is placed o E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBE THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAM AL REVISION CASE NO: 184 OF 2009 EERA VASANTHA RAO, S/O L ST & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. AND BABU, S/O KOTESWARA NAGAR, 7TH LANE, GUNTUR DISTR ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY GH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABA ...RES ner: REDDY ndent(S): UTOR lowing Order : e direction of this Court dated 11.12.2 ice, Pedakakani Police Station, Guntu n record. It was contended in the DESH
ER MANTA
LINGALU, R/O ...PETITIONER RAO, R/O RICT. ITS PUBLIC AD. SPONDENT(S): 2025, a report of ur District, dated report that the
Petitioner Mr. Ullangula Veera Vasantha Rao had died on 09.03.2022. The report also contained a copy of Death Certificate of the Petitioner.
2. The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred by the deceased Petitioner against the order of conviction passed by learned Trial Court. Since the convict/ Petitioner had already been expired, it is not necessary to proceed with the instant Criminal Revision Case.
3. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 30.12.2025
KK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 184 OF 2009
30.12.2025
KK