Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1902/2015 of M/S. PGR CONSTRUCTIONS, KURNOOL DT., Vs STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR., on 29 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1873 OF 2015 Between: 1. M/S PGR CONSTRUCTION, REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER SRI P.G.RAMANJNE-YULU U CON
APHC010679822015
IN TH
TUESDAY,T
TWO
THE HONOURA
CRIMINAL REV
CRIMINAL
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/S PGR CONST P.G.RAMANJNE-YU KURNOOL, KURNO
1. THE STATE OF A HIGH COURT, HYD
2. SRI SYED NOOR STEEL TRADERS OPP.BSNL BHAVA CRIMINAL Between:
1. M/S. PGR CONSTR PARTNER SRI P.G PARK ROAD, KURN E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBE THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAM VISION CASE NO: 1873 AND 1902 O L REVISION CASE NO: 1873 OF 201 TRUCTION, REP.BY MANAGING P ULU U CON PLAZA, 4TH FLOOR OOL DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH AND A P ANOTHER, REP.BY PUBLIC P DERABAD AHMAD, S/O.GHOUSE MIAH, PR S AGED
YEARS, R/O.H.N N PRAKASHNAGAR KURNOOL - 51 ...RES L REVISION CASE NO: 1902 OF 201 RUCTIONS, KURNOOL DT.,, REP. B G.RAMANJINEYULU, U CON PLAZA NOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP. AND DESH
ER MANTA F 2015
PARTNER SRI PARK ROAD ...PETITIONER PROSECUTOR OP.M/S.NOOR NO.44/17-D-2A 8 004 SPONDENT(S):
BY MANAGING A, 4TH FLOOR, ...PETITIONER
1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD.
2. SRI SYED NOOR AHMAD, S/O. GHOUSE MIAH, PROP. M/S. NOOR STEEL TRADERS, AGED 60 YRS., R/O. H.NO. 44/17-D-2A, OPP: BSNL BHAVAN, PRAKASHNAGAR, KURNOOL - 518004 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SHANTHASREE ELIPE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Common Order:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the instant Criminal Revision Cases has become infructuous as C.C.No.246 of 2014 has already been disposed of.
2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it appears that the instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against Criminal Miscellaneous Petition arising out of C.C.No.246 of 2014. Entire C.C.No.246 of 2014 has been disposed of by learned Court below.
3. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Cases are dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 30.12.2025
KK