Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/574/2024 of K V SUBRAMANYAM Vs THE CHAIRMAN on 28 December 2025
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 574/2024 Writ Appeal under
APHC010119912024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
WRIT APPEAL NO: 574/2024
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent be pleased to allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.No.33504/2010 dated 11-01.2024 consequently allow the Writ Petition in W.P.No.33504/2010 and such Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K V SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. K.V.SURYA SUBRAMANYAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54YEARS, SERVICE, R/O. D.NO.F.F-3, NARASIMHA ENCLAVE, TADANKIVARI VEEDHI, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND
1. THE CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE YOGAKSHEMA, WEST WING, JEEVAN BIMA MARG,
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, (PERSONNEL), LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE YOGAKSHEMA, WEST WING, JEEVAN BIMA MARG,
3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, (PERSONNEL), LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA CENTRAL OFFICE YOGAKSHEMA, WEST WING, JEEVAN BIMA MARG,
4. THE ZONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE SAIFABAD, 0PP. SECRETARIAT,
5. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA C.B-3, R/O. NEAR APSARA THEATRE, ELURU ROAD, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 97 days in Re-Presenting the Writ Appeal in W.A.Sr.No.9870/2024 and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into the service of Respondent Corporation by considering his representation dated 10-08-2024 by continuing his services till his superannuation pending disposal of the main Writ Appeal and to pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.574 of 2024 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) This Writ Appeal has been filed against the order, dated 11.01.2024 in Writ Petition No.33504 of 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.
2. At the stage of admission of this Writ Appeal, the co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed order, dated 09.07.2024 permitting the respondents to reconsider the case of the appellant/petitioner, in the light of the proviso to Regulation 19(2A) (a) (iv) of LIC (Staff) Regulations, 1960.
3. Pursuant to the same, the respondents has passed order, dated 28.11.2024 wherein it is informed to the petitioner that the respondents do not find any merit in reconsidering the case of the appellant/petitioner for allowing withdrawal of his voluntary retirement request and the same is rejected.
4. During the course of hearing of this appeal, today learned counsel on either side brought to the notice of this Court that aggrieved by the Proceedings, dated 28.11.2024 issued by the respondents, the appellant has approached this court by filing W.P.No.3524 of 2024 and it is pending. But by order dated 09.12.2024, learned Single Judge of this Court directed the registry to post that writ petition along with this Writ Appeal.
5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that in the light of the order, dated 28.11.2024 passed by respondents, pursuant to the interim order, dated 09.07.2024 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the Writ Appeal has become infrucutous.
6. As already the Proceedings, dated 28.11.2024 are challenged by the appellant in Writ Petition No.3524 of 2024, in our view, it is appropriate and desirable that it is to be heard by the learned Single Judge in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders. If that Writ Petition is heard by this Bench, the parties of the Writ Petition have to loose an opportunity of appeal before this Court.
7. For the aforesaid reasons, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
8. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:29.12.2025 SAB
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.574 of 2024 Dt.29-12-2025 SAB