Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/959/2006 of B.S.R. Gupta, Vs A.P.State Electricity Board, on 28 December 2025
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 959/2006 Writ Appeal under
APHC010486642006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
WRIT APPEAL NO: 959/2006
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 26-7-2006 WP No. 19471 of 1997 passed by his Lordship Mr. Justice V.V.S. Rao on the following among other Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B.S.R. GUPTA,, S/O.LATE RAMANAIAH, R/O. KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DIST. ...APPELLANT AND
1. A P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD.
2. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE A P S E B, SRIKAKULAM.
3. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION A P S E B, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. ASST ACCOUNTS OFFICER ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, A.P.S.E.B., KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WAMP 98931 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. T L KANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. KISHORE SAMINENI (SC FOR AP TRANSCO)
3. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO.959 of 2006 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 12.08.2025 and 17.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant and to give one more opportunity to the appellant, this appeal was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date : 29.12.2025 SAB
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 959 of 2006 Date : 29.12.2025 SAB