Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3669/2025 of ANNAPAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY Vs KOPPULA SURESH BABU on 25 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3669/2025 Between: 1. ANNAPAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O.
APHC010650222025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3669/2025
Between:
1. ANNAPAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. SAMBASIVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D.NO. 7-74, NUNNA VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KOPPULA SURESH BABU, S/o. Nagendra Rao, Aged about 45 years, H.No. 17-1-20/A21/A, Saidabad, Santosh Nagar, A.P.H.B. Colony, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the Order and Decree dated 29-08-2025
passed in I.A. No. 85 of 2025 in O.S.No. 1 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gannavaram, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y V SITHA RAMA SHARMA
Counsel for the Respondent:
None appears
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3669/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This civil revision petition is filed against the order dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner/ defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC to reject the plaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the suit itself was dismissed for default on account of non appearance of the plaintiff. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition as it became infructuous at present with a liberty to file the same in case the suit is restored to file on the application filed by the plaintiff for the said purpose.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. The civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for.
6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this civil revision petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs. _______________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY BV