Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1094/2023 of BANAVATH MANTRU NAIK Vs UNION BANK BHAVAN on 25 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1094/2023 Between: 1. BANAVATH MANTRU NAIK, S/O MUNE NAIK, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63

APHC010078942023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1094/2023

Between:

1. BANAVATH MANTRU NAIK, S/O MUNE NAIK, HINDU, AGED ABOUT

63 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O DOOR NO. 11-31-490/421, 10TH WARD, RAVIPADU ROAD, NARASARAOPET TOWN AND

MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT -522601

...PETITIONER

AND

1. UNION BANK BHAVAN, 239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG, NARIMAN

POINT, MUMBAI - 400 021, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA REPRESENTED

BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM CEO MS. MANI MEKHALAI

2. UNION BANK OF INDIA, KRISHNA PLAZA, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL

MANAGER MR. KUNDANLAL

3. UNION BANK OF INDIA, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT

ARUNDALPET, NARASARAOPET - 522601, PALANDAU DISTRICT

REPRESENT BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MISS. ANUJA

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971

praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Conternnors. Ito 3/

Respondets 1 to 3 for wilfully and delibarately violated the orders dated 01.12.2022 in IA 1/2022 in WP 34550/2022 of Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court

Act and under Artical 215 of the Constitution of India and pas such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAMA MOHAN RAO KOTHA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. K LAKSHMI NARASIMHA (SC FOR AB)

2.

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE No.1094 of 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Contempt Case has been filed complaining the willful disobedience of the respondents in implementing the order dated 01.12.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.34550 of 2022.

2. During the course of hearing today, both the learned counsels would submit that the order of the Court is complied with and hence, further adjudication in this case is not required.

3. In view of the above factual position, this Court is of the view that, no further adjudication is required in the present Contempt Case.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Date: 26.12.2025 SJ

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE No.1094 of 2023

Dt.26.12.2025 SJ

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead