Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31248/2018 of Suresh Barigala Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd, on 23 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31248/2018 Between: 1. SURESH BARIGALA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O.B.PETURU,
APHC010646722018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 31248/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SURESH BARIGALA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O.B.PETURU, R/O.H.NO.3-5/8, PEDAKOMERA, THOTAMULA VILLAGE, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE - RETAIL, HYDERABAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (RETAIL) PARISHRAM BHAVAN, BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD
2. SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER, HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, VIJAYAWADA RETAIL REGIONAL OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI ROAD, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, TADEPALLI - 522501, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. AREA SALES MANAGER, (KRISHNA DISTRICT) HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, VIJAYAWADA RETAIL REGIONAL OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI ROAD, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, TADEPALLI - 522501, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. KOTA VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT
YEARS S/O.GOPULU, R/O.D.NO.10-102, GAMPALAGUDEM VILLAGE, MANDAL AND POST KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
JS,J W.P.No.31248/2018
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly Writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to finalise the selections for retail outlet dealership at Gampalagudem based on the evaluation report dated 26-11- 2014, which is done pursuant to the order of this Honourable High Court made in W.P.No.18587/14 by declaring the subsequent evaluation proceedings report dated 29-5-2018 and which was communicated to the petitioner on 6-6- 2018 as arbitrary and illegal and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the evaluation committee report dated 29-5-2018 and which was communicated to the petitioner on 6-6-2018, pending Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
2. V SUBRAHMANYAM
JS,J W.P.No.31248/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Though the matter was adjourned on 10.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is directed to be listed on 17.12.2025. Even on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.12.2025
KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 31248/2018
Dated: 24.12.2025 KAS