Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2688/2022 of P.M. BASHA Vs P.BABU PRASAD on 22 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS: 2666 & 2688 OF 2022 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2666/2022
APHC010680972022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS: 2666 & 2688 OF 2022
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2666/2022
Between:
1. P.M. BASHA, S/O P. REDDY KHADER, MUSLIM, 61Y, OCC.
BUSINESS,
D.NO.
1-626,
SESHAPPATHOTA,
MADANAPALLE
TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. P BABU PRASAD, S/O. SREENIVASULU NAIDU, HINDU, OCC.
BUSINESS,
57Y,
D.NO.
16-620-8,
SESHAPPATHOTA,
MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M VENKATA RAMANA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2688/2022
Between:
1. P.M. BASHA, S/O P. REDDY KHADER, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 61
YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO1-626, SESHAPPATHOTA, MADANAPALLE
TOWN,
ANNAMAYYA
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. P BABU PRASAD, S/O SRECNIVASULU NAIDU, HINDU, OCC
BUSINESS,
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
D.NO.16-620-8,
SESHAPPATHOTAM MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M VENKATA RAMANA REDDY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
These two Civil Revision Petitions are preferred against the order of attachment of the E.P. schedule property in O.E.P. No.53 of 2017 in O.S. No.427 of 2015 and the order of arrest passed in O.E.P. No.46 of 2017 in O.S. No.427 of 2015 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor submits that the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor intends to pay the entire decretal amount to the Respondent/Decree Holder and for that, today, he would pay 50% of the principal decretal amount, the remaining principal amount along with interest would be paid within two weeks.
3. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor, the present Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of, directing the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor to pay the principal decretal amount on or before 20.01.2026 and to pay the accrued interest on or before 20.02.2026, without fail.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition Nos.2666 and 2688 of 2022 are disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 23.12.2025 S D P
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS: 2666 & 2688 OF 2022 Date:23.12.2025
W
S D P