Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35205/2025 of KOPPIREDDI RAJA PRUDHVI NAYUDU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 22 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 35205 OF 2025 Between: 1. KOPPIREDDI RAJA PRUDHVI NAYUDU, S/O SAMBA
APHC010685922025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 35205 OF 2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KOPPIREDDI RAJA PRUDHVI NAYUDU, S/O SAMBA MURTHY, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF UNDURU VILLAGE, OF SAMALKOT MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS. DEPT. SECRETARIAT, -AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI AP, VIJAYAWADA.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT MULTI ZONE-I, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA.
5. THE DISTRICT ENDOWMENTS OFFICER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA.
...RESPONDENTS: Counsel for the Petitioner:
Hari Krishna Tata Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Endowments The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri Hari Krishna Tata, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is against the proceedings of the 6th respondent issued under Section 83(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) dated 03.11.2025 requiring the petitioner to vacate from the subject property.
3. To the said show-cause notice, the petitioner has sent reply through his counsel on 14.11.2025. The instant writ petition has been filed alleging that the 6th respondent has no jurisdiction to issue the said notice.
4. Without going into merits of the case, having regard to the fact that the show-cause notice has been replied by the petitioner through his counsel and no final orders have been passed, since the petitioner has filed his objections to the show-cause notice, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 6th respondent to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner whenever the matter is taken up for consideration and thereafter pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, pursuant to the notice issued under Section 83(2) of the Act.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 23.12.2025 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 35205 OF 2025
Date: 23.12.2025 BSK