CRLRC/1573/2007 of R.NAZEER AHAMEDJAN Vs SMT. S.BEEBJAN & THE STATE OF A.P. on 22 December 2025

1. R.NAZEER AHAMEDJAN, S/O N.A.RAHIMAN, TYPIST M.D.O.OFFICE, HINDUPUR. NOW WORKING AT CHILAMATHUR MANDAL.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SMT S BEEBJAN THE STATE OF A P, W/O S.KHALEEL, D.NO.5-6- 99/1, GOKUL NAGAR, BEHIND DAL FACTORY, NEAR MODEL COLONY, HINDUPUR.

2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. THROUGH P.S., HINDUPUR.

...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set-aside the Order dated 14.11.07 passed in Crl.A.No.21 of 2006 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Hindupur while confirming the Order in C.C.No.61/2003 on the file of the Judl. I Class Magistrate, Hindupur. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 2308 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the Order in C.C.No.61/2003 on the file of the Judl. I Class Magistrate, Hindupur.

IA NO: 2 OF 2007(CRLRCMP 2326 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order in C.C.No.61/2003 on the file of the Judl. I Class Magistrate, Hindupur, confirming in Crl.A.No.21 of 2006 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Hindupur, by releasing the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following Order:

Today, the matter is being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. The matter is heard on merit by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred.

3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court.

4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned.

5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself.

6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court.

7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present Petitioner to comply the order. Let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 23.12.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 29.12.2025 B/o SPP

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1573 of 2007

23.12.2025

Note: Issue C.C by 29.12.2025 B/o SPP