Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/35332/2025 of NUKALA ANKITHA Vs THE BRANCH MANAGER on 21 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 35332/2025 Between: 1. NUKALA

APHC010686832025

IN THE H

(

MONDAY,THE T

TWO TH

THE HONOURABLE SRI J

THE HONOURABL

WRIT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. NUKALA ANKITHA, D R/O 46, SAI NAGA MANDALAM, PALNA

2. NUKALA SAHITHYA YEARS, R/O 46, NARASARAOPETA M

3. NUKALA SRIJA,, W/O

YEARS, R/O MANDALAM, PALNAD

4. NUKALA SIVA NAND YEARS, R/O 46, NARASARAOPETA M

1. THE BRANCH MANA BANK OF INDIA, LOD

2. THE AUTHORIZED O STATE BANK OF IND

3. THE AUTHORIZED GURUNANAK COLON

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBE HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRAN LE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDE T PETITION NO: 35332/2025 D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 2 AR, ISSAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASAR ADU DISTRICT.522601 ,, D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED A SAI NAGAR,

ISSAPALEM MANDALAM PALNADU DISTRICT. O KONJETI CHANDRA SEKHAR, AGE CHAGANTIVARIPALEM

SATT DU DISTRICT. DAN,, D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED A SAI NAGAR,

ISSAPALEM MANDALAM, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETIT AND GER, SME KOTHAPETA BRANCH, TH DGE CENTER, GUNTUR. OFFICER, SME ARUNDALPETA BRAN DIA, ARUNDALPETA, GUNTUR. OFFICER, ASSETS RECOVERY NY, VIJAYAWADA.

R NATH ROY ELA 24 YEARS, RAOPETA ABOUT 22 VILLAGE, ED ABOUT ENAPALLI ABOUT 19 VILLAGE, TIONER(S) HE STATE NCH, THE BRANCH,

4. NUKALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 7-172/5, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT.

5. M/S LAKSHMI SRINIVASA COLD STORAGE, PARTNERSHIP FIRM, 2-2, NSR COMPLEX. MAIN ROAD, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI NUKALA SRINIVASA RAO.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to DECLARE the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2 i.e. building situated in the land admeasuring an extent of 259 sq. yards in D. No. 678/2/B, 679/1A of Gurazala village and mandalam, Palnadu district, therein for recovery of certain loan amount, illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of the provisions of Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial Assets and as Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and rules made thereunder contrary to Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and and consequently SET- ASIDE the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY of all further proceedings pursuant the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2 i.e. building situated in the land admeasuring an extent of 259 sq. yards in D. No. 678/2/B, 679/1A of Gurazala village and mandalam, Palnadu district, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. J.V.PHANIDUTH Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue their remedy in the appropriate forum.

Permission is accorded.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 22.12.2025 ARR

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION NO: 35332/2025 Date: 22.12.2025

ARR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead