Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35332/2025 of NUKALA ANKITHA Vs THE BRANCH MANAGER on 21 December 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 35332/2025 Between: 1. NUKALA
APHC010686832025
IN THE H
(
MONDAY,THE T
TWO TH
THE HONOURABLE SRI J
THE HONOURABL
WRIT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NUKALA ANKITHA, D R/O 46, SAI NAGA MANDALAM, PALNA
2. NUKALA SAHITHYA YEARS, R/O 46, NARASARAOPETA M
3. NUKALA SRIJA,, W/O
YEARS, R/O MANDALAM, PALNAD
4. NUKALA SIVA NAND YEARS, R/O 46, NARASARAOPETA M
1. THE BRANCH MANA BANK OF INDIA, LOD
2. THE AUTHORIZED O STATE BANK OF IND
3. THE AUTHORIZED GURUNANAK COLON
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBE HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRAN LE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDE T PETITION NO: 35332/2025 D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 2 AR, ISSAPALEM VILLAGE, NARASAR ADU DISTRICT.522601 ,, D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED A SAI NAGAR,
ISSAPALEM MANDALAM PALNADU DISTRICT. O KONJETI CHANDRA SEKHAR, AGE CHAGANTIVARIPALEM
SATT DU DISTRICT. DAN,, D/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED A SAI NAGAR,
ISSAPALEM MANDALAM, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETIT AND GER, SME KOTHAPETA BRANCH, TH DGE CENTER, GUNTUR. OFFICER, SME ARUNDALPETA BRAN DIA, ARUNDALPETA, GUNTUR. OFFICER, ASSETS RECOVERY NY, VIJAYAWADA.
R NATH ROY ELA 24 YEARS, RAOPETA ABOUT 22 VILLAGE, ED ABOUT ENAPALLI ABOUT 19 VILLAGE, TIONER(S) HE STATE NCH, THE BRANCH,
4. NUKALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 7-172/5, PIDUGURALLA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT.
5. M/S LAKSHMI SRINIVASA COLD STORAGE, PARTNERSHIP FIRM, 2-2, NSR COMPLEX. MAIN ROAD, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI NUKALA SRINIVASA RAO.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to DECLARE the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2 i.e. building situated in the land admeasuring an extent of 259 sq. yards in D. No. 678/2/B, 679/1A of Gurazala village and mandalam, Palnadu district, therein for recovery of certain loan amount, illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of the provisions of Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial Assets and as Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and rules made thereunder contrary to Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and and consequently SET- ASIDE the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to STAY of all further proceedings pursuant the auction notice dated 13.11.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent with respect to Item No. 2 of property No. 2 i.e. building situated in the land admeasuring an extent of 259 sq. yards in D. No. 678/2/B, 679/1A of Gurazala village and mandalam, Palnadu district, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. J.V.PHANIDUTH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue their remedy in the appropriate forum.
Permission is accorded.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 22.12.2025 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 35332/2025 Date: 22.12.2025
ARR