Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/45028/2018 of K.Sita Lakshmi Vs Union of India on 21 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45028/2018 Between: 1. K.SITA LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE ARUN KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS.

APHC010932122018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 45028/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. K.SITA LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE ARUN KUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS. PROP. GOWTHAMI GAS AGENCY, 13-15-29, ARYAPURAM TIMBER DEPOT YARD,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, NEW DELHI.

2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LPG-S) INDANE AREA OFFICE, 8TH FLOOR, L.I.C.BUILDING, JEEVITHA BHIMA MARG, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE CHIEF AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, 8TH FLOOR, L.I.C.BUILDING, JEEVITHA BHIMA MARG, VISAKHAPATNAM.

4. MADIREDDY VIJAYA CHANDRA KALYANI, W/O.PRATAP, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.S.V.SQUARE, 1ST FLOOR, PLOT NO.796-B, ROAD NO.36, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3

JS,J W.P.No.45028/2018

in threatening to cancel the Petitioners LPG distributorship of Indane Gas Agency, at the instance of the Respondent No.4 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to take any coercive steps to cancel the Petitioner's LPG distributorship of Indane Gas Agency, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. B V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI

2. B JITHENDER (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL)

JS,J W.P.No.45028/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.12.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 45028/2018

Dated: 22.12.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead