WP/877/2018 of M/s Noorty Indane, Vs The Union of India on 21 December 2025

1. M/S NOORTY INDANE,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT.PENTA CHARITHA, W/O DR. KALYAN BBAU ACED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC DISTRIBUTOR (IOC), R/O NARSANNAPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM SASTRY BHAVAN, NEW DELHI

2. THE COORDINATOR, STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE, OIL MARKETING COMPANIES (LPG), REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HPCL RETAIL OFFICE), SECUNDERABAD.

3. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER(LPG), TAPSO, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE OFFICE, NO. 3-6-436 TO 438, II AND ILL FLOOR, NARSAPUR HOUSE, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD -500 029

4. THE AREA MANAGER, THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, LIC BUILDING, 8TH FLOOR, DWARAKA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,

JS,J W.P.No.877/2018

declaring the notification dated 01.09.2017 issued by the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 inviting the applications for the LPG distributorship(IOC) at SI. No. 123, Jalamuru village, Sirkakulam district issued contruy to the clause-2 of unified guide lines 2016 and clause -3 of the unified guide lines 2017, and draws scheduled be held on 5-1-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the notification dated 01.09.2017 issued by the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 inviting the applications for the LPG distributorship(IOC) at SI. No. 123, Jalamuru vi1lage, Sirkakulam district issued contrary to the clause-2 of unified guide lines 2016 and clause -3 of the unified guide lines 2017, and draws scheduled be held on 5-1-2018 pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted in WP No. 877 of 2018 dated 0501.2018 and dismiss the above referred writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA

2. B MAYUR REDDY

3. B KRISHNA KUMAR

JS,J W.P.No.877/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Ms. K. Mokshitha Rama Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 22.12.2025

KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 877/2018

Dated: 22.12.2025 KAS